- Virality
- If the audience is the territory, virality expends the territory, thus the power of the plateform, intelligent content never go viral. Virality is one of the basic process of sharecrapping.
- AI will destroy Social media
- AI represents the ultimate instrument for digital overlords and sharecrapping, as it enables a broader population to generate content at no cost. It is, in essence, the equivalent of being provided with free grain to sow.
- Ironically, this very technology is poised to bring about the demise of social media. As AI attains more sophisticated agentic capabilities, the proliferation of synthetic users producing fraudulent content and automated engagement will become unmanageable. Consequently, users will retreat from the digital sphere.
- AI colonization
- AI colonization refers to the widespread encroachment of autonomous AI agents upon digital spaces, specifically within social media environments. At present, the agentic capabilities of AI remain relatively rudimentary; consequently, the current influx is primarily limited to AI-generated content published by human users. In the near future, however, autonomous agents will generate and distribute content independently across social platforms. This represents the ultimate culmination of sharecr@pping.
- One might envision this as email spam, yet amplified tenfold in its potency. While platforms such as Meta, TikTok, and YouTube will undoubtedly deploy AI filters, these emerging agents will likely originate from outside the major foundational models (such as OpenAI or Gemini). Their spontaneous evolution will render them increasingly difficult to regulate, leading us toward the era of autonomous automated corporations.
- Within our sharecropping framework, this phenomenon is the digital equivalent of an invasive weed species—one whose propagation is so virulent that it stifles all existing cultivation. It is comparable to the historical devastation of European vineyards or the blight that triggered the Great Famine in Ireland.
- Doomscrolling
- Doomscrolling is, by design, one of the ultimate objective of every digital platform. Their primary purpose is neither to connect individuals nor to improve the world; rather, it is to extract the maximum possible value from their audience. From the perspective of 'sharecrapping,' doomscrolling represents the algorithmic expansion of territory. To extend the metaphor, it is a form of ongoing colonization. A platform serves as a kingdom where the terrain is defined by human attention, and doomscrolling is the mechanism used to conquer rival realms. Consider cinema or print media: they have already been colonized."
- News feed
- This is a prime example of digital sharecrapping: Meta capitalizes on ad revenue generated by user-produced content without offering any financial remuneration to the creators themselves. This arrangement is comparable to a tenant farmer who is allowed to eat his own produce but is strictly barred from receiving a percentage of the market sales.
- Astroturfing
- The practice of astroturfing would be inherently impossible without sharecrapping, for the fundamental reason that the latter provides the very territory required for occupation. By engineering artificial engagement, well-funded interest groups are able to circumvent the algorithms of our digital overlords, effectively disseminating their toxic influence across the entire realm. Within the world of the digital sharecropper, astroturfing serves as a chemical fertilizer.
- Fake news
-
To understand the proliferation of misinformation within Facebook newsfeeds, it is essential to grasp the concept of 'sharecr@pping.' In a standard economic model where content holds intrinsic value, there is no incentive to deceive users; rather, the objective is to build credibility so that audiences return to consult the material.
However, within a sharecr@pping ecosystem—where the platform captures the vast majority of revenue—creators are compelled to find methods to redirect users away from Facebook toward external, ad-monetized pages. Consequently, the most effective strategy is to engineer content specifically designed to trigger high engagement, thereby ensuring its viral distribution through platform algorithms. When real content does not fit the algorithm you just invent some fake one that does it. - Freedom of speech
-
Freedom of speech does not equate to equality of speech—a profound distinction frequently exploited by the wealthy. Paradoxically, those who champion free speech most fervently are often those with the power to stifle your own.
The wealthy cultivate a facade of popular discourse, whereas the reality is often merely a product of 'astroturfing.'
To draw an analogy between 'sharecropping' and 'sharecrapping': if expression is the equivalent of sowing a field, it is evident that those possessing a fleet of tractors will broadcast more content than the individual. While digital overlords permit this practice to continue—as they are the ultimate beneficiaries of the harvest—one must ask: who truly wields the influence?
- In the context of shacr@pping, freedom of speech is the equivalent of enclosure because capturing artificaly all the attention is the equivalent of expeling sharecropper outside their land
- Audience
- The audience is the territory over which the lord exercises his power. Sharecrapping is the exploitation of the audience with the help of sharecrapper by extracting add dollars from commodified subject
- Engagement
- Within the mercantile logic of digital sharecr@pping, engagement functions as the equivalent of fertilizer; it fosters the 'growth' of content to maximize its potential for virality. The more engagment a content get the more "water" he receive from the algorithm. The fundamental issue lies in the fact that fear, hatred, and anger serve as the primary drivers of engagement. Consequently, rather than producing 'nutritious' content, this system facilitates the proliferation of digital weeds or crapp.
- Content
- Content is the commodity at the heart of sharecrapping. If grain was the primary resource behind medieval sharecropping, content is the new raw resource for these new digital lords. Make no mistake: influencers aren't the only ones creating content. You create it even if you don't have a podcast or a website; your browsing activity is content, the measurement of time spent on a video is content, your 'likes' are content—and yes, you are working for free!
- Influencer
- Influencers can be seen as successful 'sharecrappers' who generate wealth from nothing. Take Instagram creators, for example: the platform provides no direct revenue for views, as the content carries no intrinsic financial worth. Instead, influencers focus on building their personal brand. This distinction is crucial: their value stems from their persona, precisely because the content they produce is ephemeral and contain no calories.
- Algorithm
- In the world of digital sharecropping (sharecrapping), the algorithm is a socio-economic concept describing the exploitation of user-generated content on third-party platforms (social media, hosts) where the users hold no ownership. In this model, the algorithm acts as a vital resource distributed arbitrarily: (attention) it determines both the visibility and the viability of content. If algorithmic access is restricted, the content undergoes 'digital attrition,' analogous to the withering of a crop deprived of water.
- Next
- NEXT is the problem
- The "Next" feature represents the fundamental issue at the heart of Sharecrapping. By allowing an algorithm to determine the subsequent content you consume, you abdicate your autonomy and forfeit your free will. Digital overlords leverage this automated sequencing to artificially expand their reach. One might wonder how radicalization has reached such proportions. Prior to 2008, "Flat Earth" communities already existed, though their membership rarely exceeded a thousand individuals. Today, through the systematic application of "Next" recommendations, their numbers have swelled into the tens of thousands.
- Sharecrapper
- Sharecrapper are the biggest beneficiaries of this audience exploitation system. In a normal media ecosystem, these people have no platform. They have no access to audiences because no one endorses their hatred. Think of Andrew Tate or Nick Fuentes. On digital platforms, in the name of free speech, they can garner attention. The platforms are de facto the publishers that allow sharecrappers to spread their hate.
- Sharecrapping
- Sharecropping is a legal arrangement in which a landowner allows a tenant (sharecropper) to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on that land (Wikipedia)
- Sharecrapping is a no choice arrangement in which a landowner (Digital overlords:plateform owner) allows a tenant (sharecrapper) to exploits user content WITHOUT RETURN
- Information retrieval
- IR
- Information retrieval (IR) in computing and information science is the process of obtaining information system resources that are relevant to an information need from a collection of those resources. Searches can be based on full-text or other content-based indexing.
- Harvesting
- IR
- Harvesting in a world of sharecrapping is the concept of collecting advertisement dollar from content produce for free by sharecropper.
- Mailling list
- The only way to espace sharecrapping while having a content business.
This is a template for a glossary page. It contains a few example items that show how things work.